FIFA will publish the ranking on 9 May.
Only 6 matches left before the deadline.
Probable results computed using the Elo Ratings. Here's the list of results:
Before posting comments like: "Hey my team actually beat the other team! It's a mistake!" please read the previous paragraph again and look when these results were posted (Yes, before the matches actually took place!) ;)
1 - First team wins
X - Draw
2 - Second team wins
15/Apr Egypt - Mauritania 1 (Friendly)
17/Apr United Arab Emirates - Iran 2 (Friendly)
17/Apr Egypt - Iraq 1 (Friendly)
25/Apr Guatemala - Paraguay 2 (Friendly)
28/Apr Malaysia - Sri Lanka 1 (Friendly)
02/May Iran - Mozambique 1 (Friendly)
Team - Minimum points - Maximum points
Paraguay | 786 | 801 |
Egypt | 539 | 578 |
Iran | 534 | 568 |
Iraq | 468 | 493 |
Guatemala | 396 | 431 |
Mozambique | 300 | 348 |
United Arab Emirates | 270 | 298 |
Malaysia | 141 | 153 |
Sri Lanka | 74 | 95 |
Mauritania | 4 | 79 |
For the other 198 teams the May points are already set.
Argentina will climb 1 spot to 9th, with Denmark dropping to 10th.
Probable May 2012 rank - Team - Probable May 2012 points - +/- Ranking - +/- Points
1 | Spain | 1442 | 0 | 0 |
2 | Germany | 1345 | 0 | 0 |
3 | Uruguay | 1309 | 0 | 0 |
4 | Netherlands | 1207 | 0 | 0 |
5 | Portugal | 1190 | 0 | 0 |
6 | Brazil | 1165 | 0 | 0 |
7 | England | 1132 | 0 | 0 |
8 | Croatia | 1114 | 0 | 0 |
9 | Argentina | 1076 | 1 | 10 |
10 | Denmark | 1069 | -1 | 0 |
11 | Russia | 1049 | 0 | 0 |
12 | Italy | 1041 | 0 | 0 |
13 | Chile | 968 | 0 | 1 |
14 | Greece | 961 | 0 | 0 |
15 | Côte d'Ivoire | 951 | 0 | 0 |
16 | France | 938 | 0 | 0 |
17 | Sweden | 931 | 0 | 0 |
18 | Republic of Ireland | 891 | 0 | 0 |
18 | Switzerland | 891 | 0 | 0 |
20 | Mexico | 867 | 0 | -1 |
21 | Australia | 862 | 0 | 0 |
22 | Ghana | 816 | 0 | 0 |
23 | Colombia | 812 | 0 | -3 |
24 | Norway | 805 | 0 | 0 |
25 | Paraguay | 801 | 0 | -2 |
26 | Czech Republic | 798 | 0 | 0 |
27 | Bosnia-Herzegovina | 792 | 0 | 0 |
28 | Slovenia | 781 | 0 | 0 |
29 | USA | 779 | 0 | 0 |
30 | Japan | 753 | 0 | 0 |
31 | Korea Republic | 746 | 0 | 0 |
32 | Serbia | 725 | 0 | 0 |
33 | Turkey | 720 | 0 | 0 |
34 | Slovakia | 716 | 1 | 0 |
35 | Hungary | 692 | 1 | 0 |
36 | Peru | 691 | -2 | -28 |
37 | Ecuador | 679 | 0 | 6 |
38 | Algeria | 667 | 0 | 0 |
39 | Mali | 656 | 0 | 0 |
40 | Zambia | 640 | 0 | 0 |
41 | Wales | 635 | 0 | 0 |
42 | Gabon | 621 | 0 | 0 |
43 | Venezuela | 613 | 0 | -4 |
44 | Belgium | 604 | 0 | 0 |
45 | Romania | 603 | 0 | 0 |
46 | Libya | 602 | 0 | 0 |
47 | Armenia | 598 | 0 | 0 |
48 | Scotland | 596 | 0 | 0 |
49 | El Salvador | 591 | 0 | 2 |
50 | Ukraine | 589 | -1 | 0 |
51 | Egypt | 578 | 4 | 12 |
52 | Jamaica | 576 | 4 | 11 |
53 | Panama | 575 | -1 | 0 |
54 | Estonia | 574 | -1 | 0 |
55 | Montenegro | 569 | -1 | 0 |
56 | Iran | 568 | -5 | -10 |
57 | Tunisia | 563 | 0 | 0 |
58 | Israel | 558 | 0 | 0 |
59 | Costa Rica | 549 | 0 | -8 |
60 | Morocco | 548 | 2 | 0 |
61 | Sierra Leone | 542 | 2 | 9 |
62 | Honduras | 540 | -1 | -10 |
63 | Nigeria | 537 | -3 | -17 |
64 | Cameroon | 526 | 0 | 0 |
65 | Poland | 514 | 0 | 0 |
66 | China PR | 508 | 0 | 5 |
67 | South Africa | 500 | 4 | 18 |
68 | Guinea | 499 | -1 | 0 |
69 | Belarus | 494 | -1 | 0 |
70 | Uzbekistan | 493 | -1 | 0 |
71 | Haiti | 486 | 1 | 9 |
72 | Austria | 475 | 1 | 0 |
73 | Iraq | 468 | -3 | -20 |
74 | Latvia | 465 | 0 | 0 |
75 | Canada | 450 | 0 | 0 |
76 | Cape Verde Islands | 449 | 0 | 0 |
77 | Senegal | 448 | 0 | 0 |
78 | Angola | 440 | 0 | 0 |
79 | Finland | 430 | 0 | 0 |
80 | Burkina Faso | 426 | 0 | 0 |
81 | Jordan | 420 | 0 | 0 |
82 | Trinidad and Tobago | 419 | 1 | 2 |
83 | Guatemala | 396 | -1 | -23 |
84 | Albania | 384 | 0 | 0 |
84 | Qatar | 384 | 0 | 0 |
86 | Korea DPR | 376 | 0 | -1 |
86 | Kuwait | 376 | 1 | 0 |
88 | Togo | 374 | 0 | 0 |
89 | Lithuania | 373 | 0 | 0 |
89 | Saudi Arabia | 373 | 0 | 0 |
91 | Congo | 366 | 0 | 0 |
92 | Oman | 363 | 1 | 2 |
93 | Uganda | 362 | -1 | 0 |
94 | Bahrain | 361 | -1 | 0 |
95 | Georgia | 360 | 0 | 0 |
96 | Bulgaria | 354 | 0 | 0 |
97 | Vietnam | 347 | 0 | 0 |
98 | FYR Macedonia | 342 | 0 | 0 |
99 | Guyana | 341 | 0 | 0 |
100 | Antigua and Barbuda | 338 | 0 | 0 |
100 | Northern Ireland | 338 | 0 | 0 |
102 | Malawi | 332 | 0 | 0 |
103 | Equatorial Guinea | 330 | 0 | -1 |
104 | Zimbabwe | 328 | 0 | 0 |
105 | Rwanda | 327 | 0 | 0 |
106 | Botswana | 321 | 1 | 0 |
107 | Bermuda | 318 | 1 | 0 |
108 | Bolivia | 308 | 1 | 0 |
109 | Azerbaijan | 305 | 1 | 0 |
110 | Mozambique | 300 | -4 | -22 |
111 | St. Kitts and Nevis | 298 | 0 | 0 |
112 | Liberia | 296 | 0 | 3 |
113 | Gambia | 292 | 0 | 0 |
113 | Sudan | 292 | 0 | 0 |
115 | Chad | 289 | 0 | 0 |
116 | Sao Tome e Principe | 288 | 0 | 0 |
117 | Kenya | 285 | 0 | 0 |
118 | Faroe Islands | 284 | 0 | 0 |
119 | Luxembourg | 283 | 0 | 0 |
120 | Namibia | 281 | 1 | 0 |
121 | Niger | 274 | 2 | 0 |
122 | Central African Republic | 271 | 2 | 0 |
123 | United Arab Emirates | 270 | -2 | -11 |
124 | Benin | 269 | 1 | 0 |
124 | Congo DR | 269 | -5 | -14 |
126 | Syria | 268 | 0 | 0 |
127 | Burundi | 267 | 0 | 0 |
128 | Liechtenstein | 261 | 1 | 0 |
129 | Lebanon | 260 | -1 | -6 |
130 | New Zealand | 256 | 0 | 0 |
131 | Iceland | 255 | 0 | 0 |
131 | Tajikistan | 255 | 0 | 0 |
133 | Cyprus | 252 | 0 | 0 |
133 | Suriname | 252 | 0 | 0 |
135 | Dominican Republic | 247 | 0 | 0 |
136 | Cuba | 244 | 0 | 0 |
137 | Kazakhstan | 243 | 0 | 0 |
138 | Ethiopia | 236 | 0 | 0 |
138 | Puerto Rico | 236 | 0 | 0 |
140 | Belize | 235 | 0 | 0 |
141 | Thailand | 232 | 0 | 0 |
142 | Moldova | 222 | 0 | 0 |
143 | Grenada | 221 | 1 | 4 |
144 | Turkmenistan | 220 | -2 | -2 |
145 | Tanzania | 217 | 0 | 2 |
146 | Nicaragua | 211 | 0 | 0 |
147 | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 191 | 0 | 0 |
148 | Philippines | 172 | 0 | -10 |
149 | Nepal | 164 | 0 | 0 |
150 | Malta | 161 | 0 | 0 |
151 | Indonesia | 159 | 0 | -1 |
152 | Bangladesh | 156 | 0 | 2 |
153 | Malaysia | 153 | 3 | 5 |
154 | Palestine | 151 | -1 | 0 |
155 | New Caledonia | 150 | -1 | 0 |
156 | Samoa | 149 | -1 | 0 |
157 | Yemen | 148 | -1 | 0 |
158 | Singapore | 145 | 0 | 0 |
159 | Curacao | 138 | 0 | 0 |
160 | Fiji | 133 | 0 | 0 |
161 | Bahamas | 132 | 0 | 0 |
161 | Hong Kong | 132 | 0 | 0 |
163 | Lesotho | 131 | 0 | 0 |
164 | India | 122 | 1 | 0 |
164 | Maldives | 122 | 0 | -8 |
166 | Madagascar | 121 | 0 | 0 |
167 | Aruba | 120 | 0 | 0 |
168 | Chinese Taipei | 117 | 1 | 0 |
169 | Guinea-Bissau | 116 | 1 | 0 |
170 | Afghanistan | 115 | -2 | -3 |
171 | Barbados | 106 | 0 | 0 |
172 | Vanuatu | 103 | 0 | 0 |
173 | Laos | 96 | 2 | 0 |
174 | Dominica | 95 | 2 | 0 |
175 | Cambodia | 94 | -2 | -7 |
175 | Myanmar | 94 | -2 | -7 |
177 | Mongolia | 88 | 0 | -2 |
177 | Tonga | 88 | 1 | 0 |
179 | Swaziland | 86 | 0 | 0 |
179 | Tahiti | 86 | 0 | 0 |
181 | Pakistan | 80 | 1 | 0 |
182 | US Virgin Islands | 78 | 1 | 0 |
183 | Solomon Islands | 75 | 1 | 0 |
184 | Sri Lanka | 74 | -3 | -8 |
185 | Cayman Islands | 72 | 0 | 0 |
186 | American Samoa | 61 | 0 | 0 |
187 | Comoros | 60 | 0 | 0 |
188 | St. Lucia | 52 | 0 | 0 |
189 | Seychelles | 47 | 0 | 0 |
190 | Eritrea | 45 | 0 | 0 |
191 | Somalia | 43 | 0 | 0 |
192 | Mauritius | 37 | 0 | 0 |
193 | Papua New Guinea | 34 | 0 | 0 |
194 | Guam | 32 | 0 | 0 |
195 | Kyrgyzstan | 29 | 0 | 0 |
196 | Cook Islands | 28 | 0 | 0 |
197 | Djibouti | 23 | 0 | 0 |
198 | Macau | 16 | 0 | -3 |
199 | British Virgin Islands | 13 | 0 | 0 |
200 | Anguilla | 9 | 0 | 0 |
201 | Bhutan | 4 | 0 | -2 |
201 | Brunei Darussalam | 4 | 1 | 0 |
201 | Mauritania | 4 | 1 | 0 |
204 | Timor-Leste | 2 | 0 | 0 |
205 | Andorra | 0 | 0 | 0 |
205 | Montserrat | 0 | 0 | 0 |
205 | San Marino | 0 | 0 | 0 |
205 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 0 | 0 | 0 |
how does Egypt reach to 578 points when beating Nigeria, Moritania & Iraq, while if we follow the FIFA Page calculations, Egept shall reach to 588 pointa if won against Nigeria & Iraq only, and did not play against Moritania ??? would you expalin please? how does egypt earn less points if played & won more game vs Moritania ??
ReplyDeleteThanks !
Mauritania are very weak. They drag Egypt's average down. They'd be better off not playing them at all. Why ae they playing a friendly against one of the worst teams in the World?
ReplyDeleteIf Egypt does not play against Mauritania and wins against Iraq (and Nigeria) they will have 2748.99 pts in 11 matches in the last year so an average of 249.91 FIFA-pts.
ReplyDeleteIf they do play and win against Mauritania they will get an extra 129 pts for this match, so for the last year 2877.99 pts in 12 matches which is an average of 239.83 FIFA-pts.
So this match will cost Egypt at least 10 FIFA-points (if they win). And this is mainly because their opponent is so lowly ranked and a win therefore will earn them much less (129 pts) than their last-year average (239.8 pts) so far.
As Lorric states: they will be better off not playing them at all.
Hey! Is there any way of finding the past four years of FIFA world ranking points accumulated by one team (I'm in particular interested in Bosnia), in order to be able to predict the team's position - I can only find the results on the FIFA site, and I would also have to calculate all of thm by hand, looking at the ten position of the opponents etc etc... Just wondering whether there is a shortcut?
ReplyDeleteThanks!
I tried to make a database to compute the world ranking, but a big problem is: when is the real (and not the official) deadline set for the used ranking in point-calculation? Is it possible to get an overview about this from after WC2006?
ReplyDeleteOfficial is Thursday, but as I read in this blog FIFA try to take up to Sunday or Saturday etc.
Thanks
Hey Vedadpasic,
ReplyDeletethere is not really a shortcut. FIFA is not that generous with information about their calculations, although it has improved a lot already compared to the old days.
But it happens that I have this info for you. Sorry for the lousy format but here are all the points per match played by Bosnia in the last four years and their FIFA-points calculation.
cycle date opponent pts
4 1-6-2008 AZE 201.000
4 20-8-2008 BUL 0.000
4 6-9-2008 ESP 0.000
4 10-9-2008 EST 540.000
4 11-10-2008 TUR 0.000
4 15-10-2008 ARM 742.500
4 19-11-2008 SVN 426.000
4 28-3-2009 BEL 1132.500
4 1-4-2009 BEL 1132.500
3 1-6-2009 UZB 112.850
3 9-6-2009 OMA 333.000
3 12-8-2009 IRN 0.000
3 5-9-2009 ARM 562.500
3 9-9-2009 TUR 432.500
3 10-10-2009 EST 645.000
3 14-10-2009 ESP 0.000
3 14-11-2009 POR 0.000
3 18-11-2009 POR 0.000
3 3-3-2010 GHA 477.300
2 29-5-2010 SWE 0.000
2 3-6-2010 GER 0.000
2 10-8-2010 QAT 94.860
2 3-9-2010 LUX 622.500
2 7-9-2010 FRA 0.000
2 8-10-2010 ALB 332.500
2 17-11-2010 SVK 546.000
2 10-12-2010 POL 129.000
2 9-2-2011 MEX 0.000
2 26-3-2011 ROU 1110.000
1 3-6-2011 ROU 0.000
1 7-6-2011 ALB 1125.000
1 10-8-2011 GRE 187.000
1 2-9-2011 BLR 1192.500
1 6-9-2011 BLR 1192.500
1 7-10-2011 LUX 645.000
1 11-10-2011 FRA 470.000
1 11-11-2011 POR 480.000
1 15-11-2011 POR 0.000
1 16-12-2011 POL 0.000
1 28-2-2012 BRA 0.000
And this leads to 792.5 points for Bosnia in the april 2012 ranking:
cycle pts MP MP_rank avg_pts weight w_avg
1 5292.000 11 11 481.09 1 481.09
2 2834.860 10 10 283.49 0.5 141.74
3 2563.150 10 10 256.32 0.3 76.89
4 4174.500 9 9 463.83 0.2 92.77
FIFA BIH 792.50
I hope this is what you are looking for.
Hey Anonymous,
ReplyDeleteHere is a list with 'real' deadline-dates for each published ranking after WC2006. This deadline-date is some kind of border. A match played before the deadline-date uses the ranking of the previous month as the ranking date (the strength of the opponent is based on the position of the opponent in that ranking). A match played on or after the deadline-date uses the ranking of the newly published ranking.
Keep in mind that for the dates marked with ** the border is not so strict. There you'll have to experiment a bit to find out for each match played on or somewhere around that deadline-date which ranking month is used to determine the strength of the opponent. Be warned that even matches played on the same day can have different ranking dates in these cases.
And then there are some other anomalies in the FIFA-points calculation, because sometimes FIFA includes a match into their fixture list some months after the match is actually played. And in that case they use the date they include the match into the list as the ranking-date and not the date the match was played. Odd and confusing! The match Poland - Bosnia (16/12/2011) is a recent example. This match was eventually included in march 2012 (I don't know the reason for this delay) and 'thus' uses the march 2012 ranking to determine the opponents strength.
Release Date Deadline Date
12-7-2006 10-7-2006
16-8-2006 10-8-2006
13-9-2006 7-9-2006
18-10-2006 12-10-2006
22-11-2006 16-11-2006
18-12-2006 15-12-2006
17-1-2007 14-1-2007
14-2-2007 12-2-2007**
14-3-2007 8-3-2007**
18-4-2007 12-4-2007
16-5-2007 10-5-2007
13-6-2007 10-6-2007
18-7-2007 16-7-2007**
22-8-2007 19-8-2007
19-9-2007 13-9-2007
24-10-2007 19-10-2007
23-11-2007 22-11-2007
17-12-2007 8-12-2007
16-1-2008 13-1-2008
13-2-2008 11-2-2008**
12-3-2008 10-3-2008
9-4-2008 5-4-2008**
7-5-2008 1-5-2008
4-6-2008 2-6-2008**
2-7-2008 30-6-2008
6-8-2008 3-8-2008
3-9-2008 31-8-2008**
8-10-2008 5-10-2008
12-11-2008 10-11-2008**
17-12-2008 12-12-2008
14-1-2009 12-1-2009**
11-2-2009 7-2-2009
11-3-2009 8-3-2009
8-4-2009 2-4-2009
6-5-2009 1-5-2009
3-6-2009 1-6-2009**
1-7-2009 29-6-2009**
5-8-2009 30-7-2009
2-9-2009 30-8-2009
16-10-2009 15-10-2009
20-11-2009 19-11-2009
16-12-2009 11-12-2009
3-2-2010 1-2-2010**
3-3-2010 28-2-2010
31-3-2010 25-3-2010
28-4-2010 23-4-2010
26-5-2010 24-5-2010
14-7-2010 12-7-2010
11-8-2010 5-8-2010
15-9-2010 11-9-2010
20-10-2010 16-10-2010
17-11-2010 13-11-2010
15-12-2010 13-12-2010
12-1-2011 9-1-2011**
2-2-2011 30-1-2011
9-3-2011 3-3-2011
13-4-2011 8-4-2011
18-5-2011 15-5-2011
29-6-2011 26-6-2011
27-7-2011 25-7-2011**
24-8-2011 19-8-2011
21-9-2011 15-9-2011
19-10-2011 16-10-2011
23-11-2011 17-11-2011
21-12-2011 19-12-2011
18-1-2012 12-1-2012
15-2-2012 13-2-2012
7-3-2012 4-3-2012
11-4-2012 5-4-2012
You can see from this list that the official deadline (the thursday prior to the wednesday when the ranking is published) is used in only a very small percentage of all the rankings.
Could you please explain how you know that the march ranking was used, instead of the (actually correct) november ranking for the match POL-BIH?
DeleteThanks a lot for your answer in advance!
The FIFA-points totals for POL and BIH that I calculated for the april ranking were different from those in the published april ranking. That is the sign that a match was included in the FIFA-calculation that was not present in my database. I found that the december-match between POL and BIH was the new entry in the FIFA-fixture list.
DeleteAfter that it is a matter of a little experimenting which ranking was used to determine the opponents strength. The leading information in this search is the last-year average (303.52) for Poland presented on the FIFA-website if you click on Poland in the april ranking table. My calculated last-year average for Poland has to correspond with that piece of information. And it did correspond if I used the march 2012-ranking (BIH on spot 21) instead of the november 2011-ranking (BIH on spot 23) or december 2011-ranking (BIH on spot 20).
1000x thanks for your help and explanation!
DeleteYou're welcome !
DeleteEd, You are most kind - thanks so much for this and for Your effort and quick reply, this is exactly what I was looking for!
ReplyDeleteAnd the format is fine! :)
Cheers!
@Ed and @Lorric
ReplyDeleteThanks for the help!