Probable results computed using the Elo Ratings. See the list of results used for this ranking. For minimum/maximum points see the preview.
Best movers:
18 - Kuwait
16 - Palestine
15 - Saudi Arabia
Worst movers:
-15 - Libya
-11 - Togo
-10 - Bahrain
Worst movers in the top 50:
-8 - Côte d'Ivoire
-7 - Algeria, Ghana
-4 - Congo
Best movers in the top 50:
6 - Costa Rica
5 - Cape Verde Islands
3 - Scotland
One team will improve its best ever ranking:
Hungary (19 - 20 in January 2016)
One will drop to new lows:
Lithuania (130 - 127 in January 2016)
Some teams will reach their best ranking in the last couple of years:
Qatar (at least 82 - 78 in November 2008) - 7 years and 3 months
Saudi Arabia (at least 60 - 57 in March 2010) - 5 years and 11 months
Others will drop to their worst ever ranking in the last couple of years:
Bahrain (at most 131 - 138 in January 2001) - 15 years and 1 month
Ghana (at most 40 - 43 in January 2008) - 8 years and 1 month
Hungary will be ranked above Côte d'Ivoire for the first time in the last 11 years and 9 months.
Thailand will be ranked above Bahrain for the first time in the last 11 years and 9 months.
Cape Verde Islands will be ranked above Algeria for the first time in the last 7 years and 6 months.
Saudi Arabia will be ranked above South Africa for the first time in the last 5 years and 9 months.
Saudi Arabia will be ranked above Uzbekistan for the first time in the last 5 years and 1 month.
Probable February 2016 rank - Team - Probable February 2016 points - +/- Ranking - +/- Points
1 | Belgium | 1494 | 0 | 0 |
2 | Argentina | 1455 | 0 | 0 |
3 | Spain | 1370 | 0 | 0 |
4 | Germany | 1347 | 0 | 0 |
5 | Chile | 1267 | 0 | -2 |
6 | Brazil | 1251 | 0 | 0 |
7 | Portugal | 1219 | 0 | 0 |
8 | Colombia | 1211 | 0 | 0 |
9 | England | 1106 | 0 | 0 |
10 | Austria | 1091 | 0 | 0 |
11 | Uruguay | 1074 | 0 | 0 |
12 | Switzerland | 1050 | 0 | 0 |
13 | Ecuador | 1040 | 0 | 0 |
14 | Netherlands | 994 | 0 | 0 |
15 | Italy | 991 | 0 | 0 |
16 | Romania | 987 | 0 | 7 |
17 | Wales | 974 | 0 | 0 |
18 | Croatia | 958 | 0 | 0 |
19 | Hungary | 945 | 1 | 0 |
20 | Turkey | 933 | 1 | 0 |
21 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 905 | 1 | 0 |
22 | Mexico | 898 | 1 | 0 |
23 | Russia | 895 | 1 | 0 |
24 | France | 868 | 1 | 0 |
25 | Czech Republic | 860 | 1 | 0 |
25 | Slovakia | 860 | 1 | 0 |
27 | Ukraine | 842 | 2 | 0 |
28 | Northern Ireland | 825 | 2 | 0 |
29 | Republic of Ireland | 810 | 2 | 0 |
30 | Costa Rica | 799 | 7 | 40 |
31 | USA | 793 | 1 | 9 |
32 | Cape Verde Islands | 790 | 7 | 45 |
33 | Côte d'Ivoire | 789 | -14 | -161 |
34 | Poland | 787 | 1 | 18 |
35 | Sweden | 771 | -1 | 0 |
36 | Albania | 746 | 2 | 0 |
36 | Algeria | 746 | -8 | -99 |
38 | Iceland | 709 | -2 | -52 |
39 | Greece | 706 | 2 | 0 |
40 | Denmark | 692 | 2 | 7 |
41 | Ghana | 691 | -8 | -85 |
42 | Trinidad and Tobago | 663 | 8 | 40 |
43 | Paraguay | 652 | 3 | 0 |
44 | Peru | 644 | 3 | 0 |
44 | Tunisia | 644 | -4 | -67 |
46 | Iran | 626 | -3 | -46 |
47 | Senegal | 621 | -2 | -40 |
48 | Scotland | 609 | 4 | 0 |
49 | Egypt | 600 | 9 | 15 |
50 | Norway | 597 | 4 | 6 |
51 | Serbia | 590 | 4 | 0 |
52 | Finland | 583 | -8 | -80 |
53 | Korea Republic | 580 | -2 | -37 |
54 | Congo | 579 | -6 | -59 |
55 | Saudi Arabia | 571 | 20 | 97 |
56 | Japan | 569 | -3 | -38 |
57 | Jamaica | 568 | -2 | -22 |
58 | Nigeria | 566 | 8 | 26 |
59 | Slovenia | 565 | 2 | 0 |
60 | Panama | 564 | 5 | 20 |
61 | Congo DR | 556 | -1 | -24 |
62 | Cameroon | 548 | -5 | -38 |
63 | Equatorial Guinea | 530 | 6 | 26 |
64 | Belarus | 514 | 4 | 0 |
65 | Australia | 510 | -6 | -73 |
66 | Guinea | 503 | -17 | -121 |
67 | Uzbekistan | 502 | 6 | 13 |
68 | Bolivia | 500 | 2 | 0 |
69 | Israel | 498 | 2 | 0 |
69 | South Africa | 498 | 5 | 12 |
71 | Bulgaria | 494 | 1 | 0 |
72 | United Arab Emirates | 486 | -8 | -61 |
73 | Morocco | 481 | 3 | 12 |
74 | Uganda | 479 | -12 | -74 |
75 | Mali | 475 | -12 | -77 |
76 | Zambia | 463 | -9 | -53 |
77 | Benin | 458 | 1 | 0 |
78 | Gabon | 452 | -1 | -16 |
79 | Qatar | 444 | 5 | 40 |
80 | Cyprus | 441 | 0 | 0 |
81 | Haiti | 424 | -2 | -29 |
82 | Venezuela | 423 | 1 | 11 |
83 | Jordan | 408 | 3 | 10 |
84 | Montenegro | 403 | 1 | 0 |
85 | Canada | 402 | 3 | 14 |
86 | Burkina Faso | 380 | 3 | -5 |
87 | Estonia | 379 | 3 | 0 |
88 | Iraq | 372 | -1 | -23 |
89 | Antigua and Barbuda | 371 | 3 | 0 |
90 | Honduras | 370 | 8 | 21 |
91 | Botswana | 367 | 4 | 4 |
92 | China PR | 365 | -10 | -48 |
93 | Faroe Islands | 357 | 3 | 0 |
94 | Korea DPR | 350 | 19 | 49 |
95 | Guatemala | 347 | -2 | -21 |
96 | Libya | 345 | -15 | -82 |
96 | Oman | 345 | 3 | 1 |
98 | El Salvador | 344 | 1 | 0 |
98 | Rwanda | 344 | -7 | -31 |
100 | Kenya | 339 | 1 | 0 |
101 | Latvia | 338 | 1 | 0 |
102 | Liberia | 337 | 1 | 0 |
103 | Zimbabwe | 335 | 5 | 13 |
104 | Mozambique | 334 | 5 | 18 |
105 | Togo | 329 | -12 | -39 |
106 | Malawi | 327 | 0 | 0 |
107 | Niger | 326 | -4 | -11 |
108 | Kyrgyzstan | 324 | -1 | 0 |
109 | Angola | 321 | -4 | -12 |
110 | Mauritania | 320 | 1 | 18 |
111 | Burundi | 316 | -1 | 9 |
112 | Nicaragua | 311 | -16 | -46 |
113 | Palestine | 307 | 18 | 40 |
114 | Central African Republic | 302 | -3 | 0 |
115 | Chad | 301 | -2 | 0 |
116 | Aruba | 298 | -1 | 0 |
116 | Turkmenistan | 298 | 1 | 4 |
118 | Azerbaijan | 296 | -2 | 0 |
119 | Sierra Leone | 290 | 2 | 5 |
120 | St. Kitts and Nevis | 289 | -1 | 0 |
121 | Kuwait | 288 | 20 | 46 |
122 | Belize | 286 | 6 | 13 |
122 | Georgia | 286 | -2 | 0 |
122 | Thailand | 286 | -1 | 1 |
125 | Armenia | 285 | -4 | 0 |
126 | Syria | 278 | -1 | 0 |
126 | Tanzania | 278 | 0 | 1 |
128 | Swaziland | 277 | 5 | 12 |
129 | Ethiopia | 276 | -11 | -15 |
130 | Lithuania | 274 | -3 | 0 |
131 | Madagascar | 272 | -2 | 0 |
132 | Bahrain | 269 | -11 | -16 |
133 | Kazakhstan | 266 | -1 | 0 |
134 | Namibia | 264 | -1 | -1 |
134 | Philippines | 264 | 1 | 0 |
136 | Sudan | 261 | -6 | -10 |
137 | Hong Kong | 259 | -1 | 0 |
138 | FYR Macedonia | 257 | 0 | 0 |
139 | Cuba | 250 | -3 | -9 |
140 | Lebanon | 246 | 0 | 1 |
140 | South Sudan | 246 | -1 | 0 |
142 | Luxembourg | 237 | 0 | 0 |
143 | Barbados | 227 | 2 | 13 |
144 | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 221 | -1 | 0 |
145 | St. Lucia | 216 | -1 | 0 |
146 | Vietnam | 209 | 0 | 0 |
147 | Guinea-Bissau | 207 | 0 | 0 |
148 | Singapore | 196 | 0 | 0 |
148 | Tajikistan | 196 | 0 | 0 |
150 | Curaçao | 192 | 0 | 0 |
150 | New Zealand | 192 | 0 | 0 |
152 | Lesotho | 186 | 0 | 0 |
153 | Afghanistan | 183 | 0 | 0 |
154 | Moldova | 170 | 0 | -2 |
155 | Guam | 169 | 1 | 0 |
156 | Maldives | 165 | 1 | 6 |
157 | Myanmar | 155 | 1 | 0 |
158 | Bermuda | 154 | 1 | 0 |
159 | São Tomé e Príncipe | 152 | -4 | -18 |
160 | Dominican Republic | 150 | 0 | 0 |
161 | Malta | 143 | 1 | 0 |
162 | Grenada | 139 | 1 | 0 |
162 | Guyana | 139 | -1 | -5 |
162 | India | 139 | 1 | 0 |
165 | Gambia | 135 | 0 | 0 |
165 | Liechtenstein | 135 | 0 | 0 |
167 | American Samoa | 128 | 0 | 0 |
167 | Cook Islands | 128 | 0 | 0 |
167 | Samoa | 128 | 0 | 0 |
170 | Timor-Leste | 127 | 0 | 0 |
171 | Malaysia | 126 | 0 | 0 |
172 | Mauritius | 120 | 0 | 0 |
172 | Puerto Rico | 120 | 0 | 0 |
174 | Comoros | 119 | 0 | 0 |
175 | Yemen | 113 | 0 | -1 |
176 | Dominica | 107 | 0 | 0 |
177 | Bangladesh | 105 | 2 | 18 |
178 | Laos | 88 | -1 | 0 |
178 | US Virgin Islands | 88 | -1 | 0 |
180 | Indonesia | 86 | 0 | 2 |
181 | Chinese Taipei | 80 | 1 | 0 |
181 | New Caledonia | 80 | 1 | 0 |
183 | Cambodia | 79 | -2 | -4 |
184 | Brunei Darussalam | 74 | 0 | 0 |
185 | Pakistan | 72 | 0 | 0 |
186 | Fiji | 68 | 0 | 0 |
187 | Montserrat | 67 | 0 | 0 |
188 | Sri Lanka | 64 | 0 | 3 |
189 | Suriname | 57 | 0 | 0 |
190 | Seychelles | 56 | 0 | 0 |
190 | Tahiti | 56 | 0 | 0 |
192 | Bhutan | 49 | 0 | 0 |
193 | Vanuatu | 47 | 0 | 0 |
194 | Macau | 44 | 0 | 0 |
195 | Cayman Islands | 42 | 0 | 0 |
196 | Nepal | 40 | 0 | -1 |
197 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 33 | 0 | 0 |
198 | San Marino | 28 | 0 | 0 |
199 | British Virgin Islands | 27 | 0 | 0 |
200 | Solomon Islands | 26 | 0 | 0 |
201 | Andorra | 6 | 0 | 0 |
201 | Mongolia | 6 | 0 | 0 |
203 | Papua New Guinea | 4 | 0 | 0 |
204 | Anguilla | 0 | 0 | 0 |
204 | Bahamas | 0 | 0 | 0 |
204 | Djibouti | 0 | 0 | 0 |
204 | Eritrea | 0 | 0 | 0 |
204 | Somalia | 0 | 0 | 0 |
204 | Tonga | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Saudi Arabia in front of Japan and Australia!!!! Lol! And the draw for the Third Phase of World Cup Qualifiers is in April.
ReplyDeleteCould be a weird seeding in April, with a group of death and a very soft group...
Assuming they qualify in March 3 of Irsn, SK, Japan and Australia in one group with 2 direct WCQ spots and 1 (2 stage) playoff spot would definitely appear to be quite tough compared to the 2010 and 2014 groupings.
DeleteUAE's 2-1 friendly win over (understrength) Iceland on 16th January will put them ahead of Australia in the February FIFA rankings
DeleteSo, as of today the 18th, what would the AFC top 10 be for the February FIFA rankings?
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteAsian top 10 in the February ranking (with the friendly Egypt-Jordan still to play on January 27th; incorporated in this ranking as a loss for Jordan):
Delete1 Iran 626
2 Korea Republic 580
3 Saudi Arabia 571
4 Japan 569
5 United Arab Emirates 520
6 Australia 510
7 Uzbekistan 502
8 Qatar 444
9 Jordan 392
10 Iraq 372
Thank you!
DeleteSo with that knowledge in addition to the likelihood that the 4 best runners up from Asia in third round of qualifying will be Korea DPR, Iraq, Syria, & UAE - the seeding in April could be something like this:
Pot 1 - Iran & Korea Rep.
Pot 2 - Saudi Arabia & Japan
Pot 3 - UAE & Australia
Pot 4 - Uzbekistan & Qatar
Por 5 - Iraq 7 North Korea
Pot 6 - Thailand & Syria
See: http://www.football-rankings.info/2015/12/2018-fifa-world-cup-afc-sims-18.html and the comments in that thread
DeleteAnd now i see another funny thing: Cape Verde first in the CAF! First!
ReplyDeleteCape Verde doesn't play in that CHAN nonsense final.
DeleteI like surprise. That's football.
ReplyDeleteMore than football, it's FIFA ranking...
DeleteNepal 4-1 Maldives, Nepal 0-0 Bangladesh On ongoing Bangbandhu Goldcup!!! It Wont be Counted??
ReplyDeleteEnter your comment...india have won 4 friendly in 2016 after winning that matches only 7 points increased ?? why ?? and can you predict rank of india in march
ReplyDeleteAbishek, India won 4 friendlies this SAFF Cup 2015 but that delivered only 127 points per match, because it was against low-ranked opposition. Their first timeframe average climbed from 87 to 99 because of that.
ReplyDeleteAt the same time the 4 friendly wins in the SAFF Cup 2011 no longer count for the ranking, so their fourth timeframe average dropped from 12 to 7. This results in a climb for India of only 7 points in the January ranking. It's all about averages in the ranking calculation.
India will have 142 points and will be found around spot 160 in the March ranking.
Thanks Ed!
ReplyDeleteEnter your comment...Assuming India will win aganist Turkminstan in march as worldcup qualifers so(539 points) what will April fifa rank of India ??
ReplyDeleteElo predicts the result of the qualifier India-Turkmenistan as a draw. With that India will have 165 points around spot 154 in April.
ReplyDeleteIf India wins they will have 193 points around spot 150. In both cases assuming the qualifier against Iran is the predicted loss.
If Nigeria wins the CHAN, how many points will had in March ranking?
ReplyDeleteIf they win the remaining 4 CHAN-matches Nigeria will have around 606 points in March. Of course the exact number of points will depend on the possible opposition in the three knock-out stages.
DeleteAt the moment elo predicts a draw against Guinea in the last group match, a win over Mali in the quarter finals, a loss to Cote d'Ivoire in the semis followed by a win against Congo DR in the play-off for third place. This results in 563 points for Nigeria in March.
???how many points will Niger had in March ranking
ReplyDeleteNiger will have 312 points in March (including the predicted CHAN-loss tomorrow against Tunisia).
ReplyDeleteI wonder Hossam, and if I may ask, what on earth do you want with this information? If you want to explore some possible WC18Q seeding pot implications of the March CAF17-qualifiers then you need at least March ranking positions of the opponents of Egypt and Senegal, not ranking points, so I'm mystified :)
yeah, Hossam, you should stop asking such nonsense questions. This may bother others.
DeleteThat is not what I said. I am just curious what Hossam wants to do with the info. He (and everybody) is allowed to ask any question. It's up to me if I want to answer a question. A question can't really 'bother' someone on the internet, does it ?
DeleteSorry Ed for overload, i want Niger ranking points to calculate Senegal's points that will gain from possible 2 wins in March, Senegal and Tunisia compete with EGypt in the 5th seat in seeding pot, sorry again if there is interuption.
Delete:D maybe I had overstated about that.
ReplyDeleteIam following your blog from 3 years regulary, and learn as a beginer how to calculate ranking points (manualy). Thank you again.
ReplyDeleteHossam, I feared as much. I will explain in detail how the calculation works in two parts.
ReplyDeletePart one:
You need the following info to compute the matchpoints for a match:
M: win/draw/loss: 3, 1 or 0 points. A win on PSO (Penalty Shoot Out) gives 2 points to the PSO-winner and 1 point to the PSO-loser;
C: strength of confederation: CONMEBOL: 1; UEFA: 0.99; CAF/AFC/CONCACAF/OFC: 0.85. Take the average of confederation strengths of both teams;
I: type of match: friendly match: 1.0; WC or continental qualifier: 2.5; continental final or Confederations Cup: 3.0; World Cup final: 4.0;
T: strength of the opponent: take the position of the opponent in the current ranking (variable p) and calculate 200 minus p. Except when p = 1 then T = 200 and when p > 150 then M is always 50;
The matchpoints P for a match are calculated as P = M * C * I * T.
Example: CAF17-qualifier Egypt-Nigeria in March. Suppose it ends 2:0.
M = 3 (for Egypt) or 0 (for Nigeria);
C = (0.85 + 0.85) / 2 = 0.85;
I = 2.5.
The difficult part is always the T-factor because you need to know the position of Nigeria in the March ranking. At the moment you don't know that position of course, because that ranking is not yet published, but you could take as a proxy the position of Nigeria in the January ranking (66).
T = 200 - 66 = 134 and matchpoints for Egypt are 3 * 0.85 * 2.5 * 134 = 854.25. For Nigeria it's 0 * 0.85 * 2.5 * (200 - 58) = 0 as Egypt's position in the January ranking is 58.
Danger is of course that in the March ranking Nigeria could have quite another position. Elo predicts for instance a March-position of 59 for Nigeria which leads to 3 * 0.85 * 2.5 * (200 - 59) = 898.875 matchpoints for Egypt. As you can see that does make a difference already.
In the case the match ends in a draw the matchpoints for Egypt are 1 * 0.85 * 2.5 * 134 = 284.75 and for Nigeria 1 * 0.85 * 2.5 * 142 = 301.75. Nigeria gets slightly more matchpoints for this draw because Egypt is higher positioned than Nigeria in the January ranking (58 vs. 66) and thus is Egypt deemed stronger than Nigeria and thus it is a better performance for Nigeria to reach a draw than it is for Egypt.
Part two:
ReplyDeleteFor the calculation of the FIFA-points of a team you need to make some more calculations. You need the matchpoints of all the matches a team has played in the last 4 years (only matches that count for the ranking, which means: all matches that are presented in the FIFA fixture/results list on their site) and calculate a so-called timeframe matchpoint average for each year. A timeframe matchpoint average is the sum of matchpoints of all matches that do count for a ranking in a specific timeframe divided by the number of matches. The 4 timeframes for the FIFA points calculation are defined by the publication date of a ranking. Each timeframe has a specific length in days and each timeframe matchpoint average is weighted with a standard weight:
1st timeframe: number of days = 365; weight = 1
2nd timeframe: number of days = 365; weight = 0.5
3rd timeframe: number of days = 365; weight = 0.3
4th timeframe: number of days = 366; weight = 0.2
The publication date of the March 2016 ranking is Thursday March 3 2016 (or in dd-mm-yyyy format 03-03-2016).
1st timeframe spans from 04-03-2015 to 28-02-2016 (the Sunday before the publication date is the cut-off)
2nd timeframe spans from 04-03-2014 to 03-03-2015
3rd timeframe spans from 04-03-2013 to 03-03-2014
4th timeframe spans from 03-03-2012 to 03-03-2013
Simple example: suppose Egypt has played the following matches in the last 4 years with the matchpoints per match presented in the last column:
1 17-11-2015 WCQ CHA 408,000
1 14-11-2015 WCQ CHA 0,000
1 11-10-2015 Fr ZAM 328,950
1 06-8-2015 Fr CIV 320,450
1 06-5-2015 Fr ALG 467,560
1 26-3-2015 Fr EQG 382,500
2 19-11-2014 CAFQ TUN 0,000
2 15-11-2014 CAFQ SEN 0,000
3 15-10-2013 WCQ GHA 0,000
3 10-9-2013 WCQ GUI 851,400
3 14-8-2013 Fr UGA 317,340
4 28-12-2012 Fr QAT 263,160
4 1-6-2012 WCQ MOZ 580,500
The FIFA points calculation for the March 2016 ranking for Egypt follows these 3 steps:
1: determine which match falls in which timeframe (presented in column 1 above: 1 = 1st timeframe; 2 = 2nd timeframe etc.)
2: calculate the timeframe matchpoint average for each timeframe. One extra constraint here: the divisor must be at least 5:
first timeframe: (408 + 0 + 328.95 + 320.45 + 467.56 + 382.5) / 6 = 1907.46 / 6 = 317.91
second timeframe: (0 + 0) / 2 = 0 / 5 = 0
third timeframe: (0 + 851.4 + 317.34) / 3 = 1168.77 / 5 = 233.754
fourth timeframe: (263.16 + 580.5) / 2 = 843.66 / 5 = 168.732
3: sum the timeframe averages with their weight: 1 * 317.91 + 0.5 * 0 + 0.3 * 233.754 + 0.2 * 168.732 = 421.78
So Egypt will have 422 (rounded to integers) points in the March 2016 ranking, based on this example set of matches.
That completes the explanation. As you can see you need a lot of info to compute a team's FIFA points for a certain ranking and you certainly don't need the FIFA points from the previous ranking in this whole calculation. See also for the official FIFA-explanation of their calculation method: http://resources.fifa.com/mm/document/fifafacts/r%26a-wr/52/00/97/fs-590_10e_wrpoints_english.pdf
I hope you have some more insight now (a spreadsheet program like Excel could be handy here) and if you have any further questions, don't hesitate to ask them !
Btw this is not my blog, it is Edgar's blog. I just comment now and then (or a lot as some might say).
Thank you very much for the detailed explanation,, from following this blog i know how to calculate the ranking after long time of thinking. This wes a very difficult but finally i get it. Thank you again.
ReplyDeleteEd, our stubid Egyptian federation arranges for two friendlies games against Libya and Jordan.we instructed them that gamef will affect our ranking but they incisted to play them and even contact the FIFA to confirm that they will be calculated. In addition we lose the 1st game against Jordan. Is there is any possibility to correct this fatal mistake and cancelling cAlculation of the two games???
ReplyDeleteIndeed Hossam, it wasn't a clever move of your FA. Those two friendlies could harm Egypt's chances for first pot considerably. If they are both won, then Egypt already loses 7 points in the predicted June ranking in comparison to the situation without the friendlies.
DeleteBut now with the unexpected loss to Jordan Egypt has already lost 30 points, and with an also unexpected loss to Libya today that would cost Egypt a total of 60 points in June. Massive and unnecessary !
Of course a lot will depend on the two qualifiers against Nigeria. Elo predicts at the moment an away-loss and a home-win for Egypt. If the away-match could be won Egypt would gain another 88 points from that win alone.
So there is plenty to play for. But it all starts with winning matches, be it friendlies (like today against Libya) or qualifiers.
I will give an updated overview of the CAF-seeding fight in two weeks (when the CHAN tournament and the Mexico-Senegal friendly are played), including different scenario's regarding the CAF-qualifiers.
And no, when a match is deemed valid and is included in the calculation, it remains included. Your only hope lies then in some match-circumstances that makes the match invalid for inclusion into the calculation like:
- a team uses more than 6 subs
- the referee and/or assistants are not approved by FIFA
- the match didn't observe the Laws of the Game.
ReplyDelete- the match didn't observe the Laws of the Game.
What are the laws of the game??
Here you go Hossam. Enjoy!
DeleteLaws of the game 2015/2016 (PDF)
With win against libya, away draw against Nigeria, home win against Nigeria, how many points will Egypt had in June ranking.
ReplyDelete634 points in June.
Deletehey ed, now that the February rankings have been published, what do you predict south korea's place will be in April? I hope they land the second spot in Asia ranking...it seems like korea will be in third place in march...just below japan
ReplyDelete