Here is the probable April 2022 ranking, to be published on Thursday March 31st. This ranking will include the conclusion of World Cup qualification in all confederations. Also a lot of friendlies are scheduled plus the preliminary play-offs in AFCON 2023 qualification. And the two-legged play-outs (still for the Nations League 2021) Estonia - Cyprus and Moldova - Kazakhstan to decide which two teams will stay in league C and which two will relegate to league D for the next Nations League 2022-2023, with the group stage of that tournament already to be played in June and September this year.
The Russian war in Ukraine that the delusional and fully accountable mister Putin started, have lead to some extraordinary measures taken by FIFA:
- the Russian NT is suspended for the semi-final play-off in path B against Poland. This means that Poland receives a bye to the path B final and will play at home against the winner of Sweden/Czech Republic;
- the semi-final play-off in path A between Scotland and Ukraine is postponed to the June window and as a result also the path A final is postponed to that window. The other semi-final in this path between Wales and Austria will be played as originally scheduled on March 24th.
This preview is calculated with elo-predicted results for all 145 currently scheduled and according to my method included matches, out of a total of 159 currently scheduled matches. See the probable results for a list of which scheduled matches are included.
pos Apr |
team |
pts Apr |
+/- pos |
+/- pts |
1 |
Brazil |
1832,69 |
1 |
9,27 |
2 |
Belgium |
1832,00 |
-1 |
3,55 |
3 |
France |
1789,87 |
0 |
3,72 |
4 |
Argentina |
1777,84 |
0 |
10,85 |
5 |
England |
1761,71 |
0 |
6,19 |
6 |
Italy |
1743,74 |
0 |
2,97 |
7 |
Spain |
1709,16 |
0 |
4,41 |
8 |
Portugal |
1676,52 |
0 |
16,27 |
9 |
Mexico |
1670,73 |
3 |
22,83 |
10 |
Denmark |
1658,51 |
-1 |
3,97 |
11 |
Netherlands |
1653,70 |
-1 |
-0,03 |
12 |
Germany |
1650,49 |
-1 |
2,16 |
13 |
Switzerland |
1640,29 |
1 |
-2,54 |
14 |
USA |
1633,91 |
-1 |
-9,43 |
15 |
Croatia |
1626,07 |
0 |
5,33 |
16 |
Uruguay |
1623,23 |
0 |
9,18 |
17 |
Colombia |
1600,52 |
2 |
14,63 |
18 |
Sweden |
1597,28 |
-1 |
9,02 |
19 |
Senegal |
1596,07 |
-1 |
8,29 |
20 |
Wales |
1588,93 |
0 |
10,92 |
21 |
Iran |
1577,19 |
0 |
4,30 |
22 |
Morocco |
1563,85 |
2 |
16,43 |
23 |
Peru |
1562,03 |
-1 |
-1,42 |
24 |
Japan |
1553,85 |
-1 |
4,03 |
25 |
Serbia |
1542,62 |
0 |
-4,76 |
26 |
Chile |
1538,90 |
0 |
-4,26 |
27 |
Poland |
1538,50 |
1 |
7,88 |
28 |
Ukraine |
1535,08 |
-1 |
0 |
29 |
Korea Republic |
1532,30 |
0 |
9,45 |
30 |
Nigeria |
1516,51 |
2 |
6,60 |
31 |
Canada |
1516,49 |
2 |
18,67 |
32 |
Austria |
1500,65 |
-2 |
-10,91 |
33 |
Czech Republic |
1499,77 |
-2 |
-10,65 |
34 |
Russia |
1493,42 |
1 |
0 |
35 |
Egypt |
1488,76 |
-1 |
-8,29 |
36 |
Australia |
1486,99 |
1 |
0,13 |
37 |
Tunisia |
1482,24 |
-1 |
-7,68 |
38 |
Algeria |
1474,36 |
5 |
13,43 |
39 |
Scotland |
1471,82 |
1 |
0 |
40 |
Cameroon |
1467,39 |
-2 |
-13,43 |
41 |
Hungary |
1466,04 |
0 |
0,42 |
42 |
Costa Rica |
1465,87 |
0 |
1,81 |
43 |
Turkey |
1464,53 |
-4 |
-8,19 |
44 |
Norway |
1463,45 |
1 |
8,02 |
45 |
Mali |
1460,43 |
3 |
13,94 |
46 |
Ecuador |
1452,42 |
-2 |
-6,21 |
47 |
Romania |
1451,50 |
0 |
-1,68 |
48 |
Slovakia |
1450,03 |
-2 |
-5,33 |
49 |
Qatar |
1446,37 |
3 |
8,46 |
50 |
Republic of Ireland |
1444,51 |
-1 |
0,22 |
51 |
Cote d'Ivoire |
1435,28 |
0 |
-4,34 |
52 |
Saudi Arabia |
1432,48 |
1 |
-1,47 |
53 |
Paraguay |
1431,09 |
-3 |
-9,44 |
54 |
Northern Ireland |
1428,60 |
0 |
3,63 |
55 |
Greece |
1421,53 |
0 |
-0,46 |
56 |
Finland |
1416,82 |
1 |
5,05 |
57 |
Burkina Faso |
1414,61 |
-1 |
-3,97 |
58 |
Bosnia-Herzegovina |
1398,54 |
1 |
7,35 |
59 |
Venezuela |
1398,14 |
-1 |
-13,31 |
60 |
Jamaica |
1390,68 |
2 |
12,06 |
61 |
Albania |
1376,76 |
4 |
1,78 |
62 |
Iceland |
1375,89 |
-2 |
-6,92 |
63 |
Ghana |
1374,86 |
-2 |
-6,59 |
64 |
Panama |
1369,83 |
-1 |
-5,73 |
65 |
Slovenia |
1368,28 |
-1 |
-7,14 |
66 |
North Macedonia |
1362,42 |
1 |
-4,81 |
67 |
South Africa |
1360,98 |
1 |
2,74 |
68 |
Congo DR |
1353,10 |
-2 |
-16,43 |
69 |
Montenegro |
1342,70 |
3 |
-0,19 |
70 |
Bulgaria |
1338,82 |
1 |
-6,65 |
71 |
Cape Verde Islands |
1338,46 |
2 |
1,58 |
72 |
Iraq |
1338,33 |
2 |
12,89 |
73 |
El Salvador |
1331,86 |
-3 |
-14,18 |
74 |
United Arab Emirates |
1331,73 |
-5 |
-21,37 |
75 |
Oman |
1311,96 |
4 |
10,96 |
76 |
Israel |
1305,96 |
1 |
-0,74 |
77 |
China PR |
1303,72 |
-2 |
-10,09 |
78 |
Bolivia |
1298,81 |
-2 |
-9,31 |
79 |
Curacao |
1298,39 |
1 |
0 |
80 |
Gabon |
1290,65 |
2 |
0 |
81 |
Guinea |
1288,21 |
0 |
-4,37 |
82 |
Uganda |
1282,98 |
2 |
3,80 |
83 |
Benin |
1282,53 |
0 |
0 |
84 |
Uzbekistan |
1281,56 |
1 |
4,54 |
85 |
Honduras |
1277,94 |
-7 |
-26,02 |
86 |
Bahrain |
1275,76 |
3 |
12,15 |
87 |
Haiti |
1266,86 |
0 |
-1,19 |
88 |
Zambia |
1262,43 |
0 |
-2,21 |
89 |
Georgia |
1261,40 |
-3 |
-7,84 |
90 |
Jordan |
1259,84 |
0 |
0 |
91 |
Syria |
1240,61 |
0 |
-10,61 |
92 |
Armenia |
1240,17 |
0 |
-2,07 |
93 |
Lebanon |
1236,50 |
2 |
7,53 |
94 |
Belarus |
1233,23 |
0 |
-0,20 |
95 |
Luxembourg |
1229,69 |
-2 |
-6,76 |
96 |
Kyrgyzstan |
1224,15 |
0 |
-4,54 |
97 |
Congo |
1221,40 |
0 |
0 |
98 |
Vietnam |
1214,97 |
0 |
-3,58 |
99 |
Equatorial Guinea |
1210,07 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
Madagascar |
1209,16 |
2 |
3,55 |
101 |
Palestine |
1208,90 |
-1 |
0 |
102 |
Trinidad and Tobago |
1205,99 |
-1 |
0 |
103 |
New Zealand |
1205,84 |
8 |
44,18 |
104 |
Kenya |
1202,26 |
-1 |
0 |
105 |
Estonia |
1183,84 |
1 |
7,34 |
106 |
India |
1174,04 |
-2 |
-8,71 |
107 |
Sierra Leone |
1173,81 |
0 |
0 |
108 |
Cyprus |
1171,31 |
-3 |
-7,34 |
109 |
Korea DPR |
1169,96 |
-1 |
0 |
110 |
Thailand |
1167,68 |
2 |
7,54 |
111 |
Kosovo |
1163,92 |
-2 |
0,87 |
112 |
Namibia |
1162,93 |
-2 |
0 |
113 |
Guinea-Bissau |
1158,62 |
0 |
0 |
114 |
Niger |
1158,23 |
0 |
-0,16 |
115 |
Mauritania |
1157,43 |
1 |
4,91 |
116 |
Gambia |
1150,69 |
9 |
15,51 |
117 |
Libya |
1149,67 |
1 |
0,16 |
118 |
Tajikistan |
1148,75 |
-3 |
-3,81 |
119 |
Mozambique |
1146,09 |
-2 |
-4,92 |
120 |
Malawi |
1145,08 |
-1 |
0 |
121 |
Guatemala |
1142,85 |
2 |
4,45 |
122 |
Kazakhstan |
1142,45 |
-2 |
1,74 |
123 |
Faroe Islands |
1142,36 |
1 |
5,37 |
124 |
Zimbabwe |
1138,56 |
-2 |
0 |
125 |
Azerbaijan |
1137,00 |
-4 |
-2,02 |
126 |
Togo |
1133,24 |
0 |
0 |
127 |
Angola |
1131,72 |
0 |
0 |
128 |
Antigua and Barbuda |
1131,08 |
0 |
0 |
129 |
Philippines |
1129,00 |
0 |
-0,91 |
130 |
Central African Republic |
1127,20 |
0 |
0 |
131 |
Comoros |
1126,20 |
0 |
0 |
132 |
Tanzania |
1118,76 |
0 |
0 |
133 |
Sudan |
1118,31 |
0 |
0 |
134 |
Turkmenistan |
1117,60 |
0 |
0 |
135 |
Latvia |
1100,06 |
0 |
0,03 |
136 |
Rwanda |
1097,16 |
0 |
0 |
137 |
Lithuania |
1092,01 |
0 |
0,24 |
138 |
Ethiopia |
1081,23 |
0 |
0 |
139 |
St. Kitts and Nevis |
1077,30 |
0 |
-0,46 |
140 |
Lesotho |
1073,67 |
6 |
16,05 |
141 |
Suriname |
1073,39 |
-1 |
-4,18 |
142 |
Burundi |
1072,58 |
-1 |
-3,24 |
143 |
Eswatini |
1070,46 |
4 |
16,32 |
144 |
Kuwait |
1064,90 |
-1 |
-0,66 |
145 |
Solomon Islands |
1064,59 |
-3 |
-8,19 |
146 |
Nicaragua |
1062,21 |
-2 |
0 |
147 |
Liberia |
1058,28 |
-2 |
0 |
148 |
Hong Kong |
1053,39 |
0 |
0 |
149 |
Botswana |
1051,59 |
0 |
0 |
150 |
Yemen |
1046,26 |
1 |
0 |
151 |
Afghanistan |
1046,22 |
-1 |
-3,55 |
152 |
Myanmar |
1044,56 |
0 |
0 |
153 |
New Caledonia |
1040,52 |
0 |
5,40 |
154 |
Malaysia |
1035,11 |
0 |
0,58 |
155 |
Andorra |
1030,18 |
0 |
-0,10 |
156 |
Dominican Republic |
1029,42 |
0 |
0 |
157 |
Maldives |
1025,50 |
0 |
3,92 |
158 |
Chinese Taipei |
1017,78 |
0 |
0 |
159 |
Tahiti |
1016,24 |
0 |
1,97 |
160 |
Vanuatu |
1008,03 |
4 |
12,41 |
161 |
Indonesia |
1001,61 |
-1 |
0 |
162 |
Singapore |
1001,11 |
-1 |
0,33 |
163 |
Fiji |
1000,78 |
-1 |
4,51 |
164 |
South Sudan |
998,45 |
4 |
20,64 |
165 |
Barbados |
995,94 |
-2 |
0 |
166 |
Bermuda |
982,43 |
0 |
0 |
167 |
Nepal |
978,86 |
0 |
-3,36 |
168 |
Grenada |
973,45 |
1 |
-0,58 |
169 |
Belize |
967,42 |
1 |
0 |
170 |
Cambodia |
966,61 |
1 |
0 |
171 |
Puerto Rico |
962,77 |
1 |
0 |
172 |
Malta |
961,61 |
2 |
2,66 |
173 |
St. Vincent and the Grenadines |
960,71 |
0 |
0 |
174 |
Mauritius |
959,01 |
2 |
3,83 |
175 |
Guyana |
958,87 |
0 |
0 |
176 |
Papua New Guinea |
958,69 |
-11 |
-31,86 |
177 |
St. Lucia |
953,45 |
0 |
0 |
178 |
Montserrat |
950,71 |
0 |
0 |
179 |
Cuba |
945,71 |
0 |
-3,25 |
180 |
Moldova |
925,11 |
1 |
-1,74 |
181 |
Macau |
922,10 |
1 |
0 |
182 |
Chad |
919,48 |
-2 |
-15,52 |
183 |
Dominica |
916,72 |
0 |
0 |
184 |
Mongolia |
911,56 |
0 |
-5,12 |
185 |
Bhutan |
910,96 |
0 |
0 |
186 |
Bangladesh |
909,03 |
0 |
1,20 |
187 |
Sao Tomé e PrÃncipe |
905,74 |
2 |
2,43 |
188 |
Laos |
904,60 |
-1 |
0 |
189 |
Brunei Darussalam |
903,90 |
-1 |
0 |
190 |
American Samoa |
900,27 |
0 |
0 |
191 |
Liechtenstein |
895,11 |
0 |
-4,41 |
192 |
Samoa |
894,26 |
1 |
0 |
193 |
Cook Islands |
879,60 |
- |
-28,40 |
194 |
Djibouti |
875,98 |
-2 |
-20,64 |
195 |
Cayman Islands |
873,64 |
0 |
0 |
196 |
Pakistan |
866,81 |
1 |
0 |
197 |
Timor-Leste |
865,47 |
1 |
0 |
198 |
Tonga |
861,81 |
1 |
0 |
199 |
Aruba |
859,97 |
1 |
0 |
200 |
Bahamas |
858,50 |
1 |
0 |
201 |
Somalia |
857,39 |
-7 |
-16,32 |
202 |
Eritrea |
855,56 |
0 |
0 |
203 |
Seychelles |
854,58 |
-7 |
-16,05 |
204 |
Gibraltar |
852,20 |
-1 |
-1,40 |
205 |
Sri Lanka |
842,93 |
-1 |
0 |
206 |
Turks and Caicos Islands |
839,84 |
-1 |
0 |
207 |
Guam |
838,33 |
-1 |
0 |
208 |
US Virgin Islands |
816,13 |
-1 |
0 |
209 |
British Virgin Islands |
812,94 |
-1 |
0 |
210 |
Anguilla |
792,34 |
-1 |
0 |
211 |
San Marino |
778,01 |
-1 |
-2,32 |
About me:
Software engineer, happily unmarried and non-religious. You won't find me on Twitter or other so called social media. Dutchman, joined the blog in March 2018.
Thanks for the April information. Can you please explain the Cook Islands ranking situation?
ReplyDeleteIt's my understanding that they did not have a rank since July 2019 [908.00] or didn't play since the introduction of the new FIFA ranking system. So how is FIFA treating this situation?
Exactly as you say, Ram. The Cook Islands were excluded from the FIFA ranking after July 2019 when they had 908 points and hadn't played a match in 4 years.
ReplyDeleteNow they will play their first competitive match since September 2015 with 908 points as their starting point for the match points calculation of that match. And they will join the April 2022 ranking again after their March qualification matches.
Elo predicts they will lose all 3 group matches and lose 28,4 points for the FIFA ranking.
My goodness, what a mess and sad situation in OFC Qualifying...As per FIFA.com - "For the avoidance of doubt, the match between the Cook Islands and the Solomon Islands, which took place on 17 March 2022 with a 2-0 result in favour of the Solomon Islands, will count with respect to the FIFA/Coca-Cola World Ranking, although it will not count with respect to the preliminary competition Group A standings."
ReplyDeleteSOURCE : FIFA.com.
I must disagree with your expectations (and hopes) regarding seedings of teams which will participate at June play offs. Why would you take the highest team ranking? Keep in mind that almost 90% participants will be known next week. Almost half is already known. Teams which failed to clinch the world cup spot until June must NOT be seeded over teams from the same continental zones which already beaten them. Australia/Syria/Peru or Costa Rica/New Zealand who cares?! They cannot be over already qualified Canada or Ecuador. Pot 4 is only reasonable pot for them.
ReplyDeleteException could be only european contestant Wales/Scotland/Ukraine is moved to June because of high force. However I would not seed any european playoff winner over group winners from the November.
Assume that for some reason the path A final was postponed to June and Italy and Portugal were qualified for that final. In that case FIFA would not have hesitated to seed the placeholder-berths according to highest ranking.
DeleteBecause in that case it is obvious for everyone that neither one of them belongs to pot 4.
I think you should solve this situation with placeholder-berths to be drawn (and seeded) always in the same style, no matter which participants actually qualified for the play-offs. Preferably this should already be described in the regulations beforehand, but alas, FIFA's regulations are always notoriously vague.
So for me, it doesn't matter at all at what moment and which how much effort participants exactly qualify. It's the principle that the seeding should be fair and simple and should never lead to the possible situation that strong teams are seeded (far) below their strength and the chance for unbalanced groups is relatively high. Because that was in 2017 one of the main reasons to switch to a seeding of the final draw completely based on a FIFA ranking.
And if a less strong team qualifies eventually from a play-off, then it has proven (by beating the stronger opponent) that the higher seeding in the draw was justified after all.
Hello Ed,
ReplyDeleteI have a question about Egypt team. If Egypt drew with Senegal , Egypt become 1513 points. If Egypt lose to Senegal 1-0 in dakar and win on penalties , Egypt becomes 1519 points ! Is that correct? Or if Egypt loses 1-0 and won by penalties it will be counted as a loss?
Never mind, it will be counted as a loss
DeleteIndeed Fan, in case of a two-legged play-off and both legs end in a draw (the second after extra time, that is) then the tie is decided by PSO and the points calculation of the second match starts with 0.75 for the PSO-winner and 0.5 for the PSO-loser.
ReplyDeleteIn this case when Egypt loses 1-0 in Dakar after extra time and PSO is necessary to get a decision the points calculation for the return leg starts with 1.0 for Senegal and 0.0 for Egypt.
Why would Mexico climb in the rankings from Feb, and higher than the U.S., when it looks like they will take 3rd in Concacaf and are 0-3-1 vs U.S. over the past couple of years?
ReplyDeleteSimple, because elo predicted a Mexico win against the USA and a USA draw in Costa Rica. See the probable results page.
DeleteBasically, they entered all of those with a way higher starting point - and the US dropped a lot of other games (loss to Panama, draw against El Salvador, etc.)
DeleteThe new FIFA rankings are a lot better than the other ones, but a consistent complaint about them is that they are slow to react to teams changing skill level (see Canada, Ecuador).
Which is a good thing, to have some inertia in the ranking. A temporary dip in form doesn't need to be directly reflected in the ranking. When a team consistently performs above their initial weight (like Canada now) they climb the ranking anyway. Canada climbed 40 places in a year. What's that about 'slow to react' ?
DeleteEcuador is another story. They were heavily screwed around the transformation from the old ranking method to the new ranking calculation method in 2018 and are since then structurally positioned below their 'weight'. They have real difficulty to gain enough points to climb substantially in the current points system.